the birth of bioculture in globecomization era towards psycho turn in politics and creation of a psychoanalitic political sociology

in the present article, the author has replaced the concept of “globalization” with “globecomization” and through formulating the concept of “bioculture”. the article attempts to explain novel mechanism and techniques of “power”to manage individuals and the population. the author has defined “bioculture” as a new style of governance through an alloy-like composition of “power, technology and psyche”. he has argued that along with the evolution of technology and its full-scale historical development in the individuals’ every day life, governing the man and his will would be more observed through “bioculture” and “psychotechnology” than through “biopolitics” and “body technology”. viarelying on theunceasing implications of “psycho technology”, “power”intends to simultaneously develop “ramification and great suspension of thought” and “increasing recreation in the man’s psycho”. relying on centralization of “body enjoyment” and “consumption enjoyment”, power establishes a sort of “architectonic political economy” and manages individual and thepopulation. along with redefining “the political” (as power with a technological nature and psychical-orientation), the author has proposed and then justified the need to move towards a “psycho turn in the field of politics” and creation of a “psychoanalytic political sociology”.